Why Obama can't wait, and why he won't

While the Republican candidates continue to gnaw at each other's ankles as they try repeatedly - and unsuccessfully - to claw their way out of a barrel, and as the rest of the Republican party continues to meekly bend over, close eyes, and spread cheeks before the unrelenting onslaught of the Tea Party, President Obama's long term strategy of backing the enemy into a corner with nowhere left to turn continues to unfold.  A good friend of mine recently questioned the often debated point about whether Obama is actually a three-dimensional chess player who thinks and acts several moves ahead, or is he being given too much credit by the Obamabots who refuse to face the fact that the president would rather sell the family store and call it a day than stand and fight for what's right. And for what's ours.

At least in this instance - and I would argue there have been others as well - it is becoming clear Obama has seen much further down the road than the opposition. With the unveiling this week of the 'Can't Wait' strategy, where Obama has essentially announced plans to toss the let-us-reason-together approach overboard, bound and gagged, into the cold waters below in favor of the far simpler middle-finger extended approach, my guess is it may just now be dawning on the Republicans who they're dealing with.

Here's the abbreviated version of how we got here: Obama first announced his  $447 billion jobs bill  on September 8 with one of his more masterful media performances given before the full Congress. Possibly his best to date. He knew he had a good plan, a great  plan, but he also knew by now that it didn't matter if God Himself  had co-written the bill because so long as Obama's name was anywhere to be seen on it then the Republicans were going to shoot it out of the sky and then torch it. And so they did. But it was during that address to Congress when Obama offered a glimpse of where he was headed when he instructed Republicans in the obvious, that Americans did not have the luxury of waiting until 2013 before any action could be taken to offer them jobs relief. He knew the Republicans didn't want to give him a win, but this wasn't about giving Obama a win so much as it was about addressing the jobs crisis. People  need jobs right now, and they can't afford to wait and gamble their lives on the slim possibility that one of the Republican presidential candidates just might succeed in unseating him - and then come to the rescue of the struggling middle class whom they have scorned and ignored for so long.

"Pass this jobs bill," said Obama.

Kiss our ass, replied the Republicans.

But for awhile now the polls have shown that a majority of the American people are  growing more and more in favor of Obama's jobs bill the more they learn about it. One, because it's a good bill that offers quite a few good things, and two, because the Republicans have no plan of their own. They rarely do.  The primary two reasons Republicans can't support the bill are that  it's an Obama bill and that rich folks will be required to pay their fare share in taxes to help fund the program. Republicans claim Obama is engaging in class warfare, but an increasing number of Americans are beginning to realize that this is Grade A bullshit. As disorganized as the Occupy Wall Street movement may be, I think it's safe to say the sheer numbers of pissed off Americans involved is either inspiring or intimidating, depending which side of the fence you're on. And I think it's also safe to say the Republicans will not be the beneficiaries of this movement - a movement which currently enjoys much more popularity and support than either the Tea Party or the Congress. A movement which most definitely lists as one of its many demands that the wealthy corporations start handing over their fair share.

So now, feeling the momentum gaining, Obama announces that since it appears the Republicans are determined to obstruct anything he does to help the American people, he plans to take matters into his own hands and begin implementing as much of his agenda as possible via executive orders. In other words, taunting Republicans into a direct, full-on, come on mf show me what you got kinda battle. Do the Republicans really want to be on record vetoing the president's attempt to offer relief to the majority of American people so desperately in need? Truth is - and Obama knows this - they very possibly will have no problem being that coldly calculating. But if so, Obama more than likely wins. And if they cave and say, "Fine. Bread for the masses. Whatever." then Obama wins.

Obama has laid the Compromiser-In-Chief to rest, and has very possibly buried Republican hopes for an Obama one-term presidency right along with him.

 

 

The kind of folks who laugh at executions...

First of all, yes I think President Obama did a hell of a job last night.  There was no question that the President was going to have to 'go big' on this one and swing for the bleachers. This was not the time to tread the moderate path, nor was it the time to reprise his role as the only adult in the room.  Being the only adult in the room doesn't much matter when everyone else has left the room, and the president's sagging poll numbers strongly suggest that something dramatic is needed to jump start his game.

The jobs proposal Obama delivered on Thursday night was a big step in the right direction.  Although it is highly unlikely - to say the least - that Republican legislators will bow down before the sheer weight of his wisdom and obediently pass Obama's jobs bill right away as he requested, it will nevertheless serve to steer the oncoming debate for 2012.  Pretty much everyone agrees that jobs is  the only major issue of significance right now confronting the nation, and since the Republicans have yet to present any coherent vision of how to tackle that issue, they now are confronted with the task of measuring up with a plan of their own. Simply shooting down the President's plan is not a winning strategy because, as Obama pointed out last night, the election is 14 months away and most Americans don't have the luxury to sit around and wait to see who wins before some action is taken to get them back to work. And do they really want to gamble away any and all options for improving the lives of thousands of Americans on the misguided hope that Obama is going to lose? Is that who they are?

Well, if we are to judge by the response of the Wednesday night crowd who attended the Republican presidential debate, then the answer may well be, hell yes. For those who haven't seen the video, just take a listen to the reaction when Texas Gov. Rick Perry is confronted with the fact that he signed off on the execution of 234 individuals during his term in office. The audience spontaneously broke out into applause. Once the bloodthirsty crowd had calmed themselves, and a respectful quiet had returned to the Roman coliseum where the debate apparently took place, Perry was asked by reporter Brian Williams, who moderated the debate, if perhaps Perry ever felt guilty or lost any sleep at the prospect that maybe some of the folks he had allowed to be put to death were, in fact innocent. Perry's response:

"No, sir. I've never struggled with that at all. The state of Texas has a very thoughtful, a very clear process in place of which -- when someone commits the most heinous of crimes against our citizens, they get a fair hearing, they go through an appellate process, they go up to the Supreme Court of the United States, if that's required.

"But in the state of Texas, if you come into our state and you kill one of our children, you kill a police officer, you're involved with another crime and you kill one of our citizens, you will face the ultimate justice in the state of Texas, and that is, you will be executed."

This noble sentiment was, of course, followed up by more applause. And I have to admit, the way Perry answered the question made it seem almost unpatriotic not to applaud executions. I mean after all, who wouldn't  want to execute a child-killer or a cop killer? Right? Right?

But here's the thing; it's not that there isn't some justification for the death penalty in certain cases. There are without question folks among us whose best contribution to society would be to expelled from it. Not everybody can be rehabilitated, and life without parole isn't always enough. But the prospect of anyone being executed is not a reason to applaud, let alone the execution of 234 individuals. And the thought that Perry is unrepentant about the fact that he may have put an innocent person - or persons - to death is bad enough on its own. But the fact that such an unrepentant attitude  is applauded by a roomful of  voters  is evidence of a severe sickness that is spreading. Those folks need help.

Then again, if Perry manages to win the 2012 election, it's the rest of us who will need help.

This is being cross-posted in Black Liberal Boomer